Peruvian President Kuczynski Narrowly Escapes Impeachment in Congress

2
PPK acudió este jueves 21 de diciembre con su abogado al Congreso y durante su alocución intentó defender su posición
With 78 votes in favor, 19 against and 21 abstentions, Congress decided Kuczynski should remain in office despite allegedly receiving payment from the Brazilian construction company Odebrecht between 2001 and 2005. (Twitter)

Espa√ĪolAfter a debate that lasted more than 14 hours, congressmen in Peru voted¬†not to impeach¬†President Pedro Pablo Kuczynski.

With 78 votes in favor, 19 against and 21 abstentions, Congress decided Kuczynski should remain in office despite allegedly receiving payment from the Brazilian construction company Odebrecht between 2001 and 2005.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

Kuczynski was supposed to relinquish all ties to his businesses, but one consulting firm called Westfield Capital ‚ÄĒ which listed only¬†Kuczynski as an owner¬†‚ÄĒ continued to operate through his partner¬†Gerardo Sep√ļlveda, of Chile.

After adamantly denying the claims publicly and in a letter to Congress, Kuczynski agreed to appear before the Lava Jato Commission. Afterward, Congress voted on whether to impeach him, failing to obtain the 87 votes needed to do so.

https://twitter.com/congresoperu/status/944059480207130624

In his speech to Congress, Kuczynski¬†said¬†he had¬†never lied about his finances,¬†while warning that¬†his dismissal would put the democracy of the country at risk.¬†He¬†admitted that Westfield Capital’s financial¬†transactions were made¬†“between private companies, private consortiums and respond to private services.”

“I do not have and I had nothing to hide. I love my country and my people … I’ve been wrong many times and I ask for deep apologies, I just hope that Parliament understands the historical magnitude of the error that it intends to commit and does not vote for a vacancy motion … the damage will not be done to me but to Peru.”

During the debate, Fujimorism exposed its repudiation of Kuczynski and its “lies” by reiterating that it did not receive money or maintain direct contracts with Odebrecht.¬†Congressman¬†Kenji Fujimori explained¬†he was going to¬†abstain from voting despite the position of his party.

Members of Frente Amplio reportedly kept a low profile during the debate and left the decision for or against the vacancy up to each of its members.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter
Sign up here to get the latest news, updates and special reports delivered directly to your inbox.
You can unsubscribe at any time