Fidel Castro May Be Gone, But Socialism in Cuba Is Alive As Ever

By: José Azel - Jan 4, 2017, 2:32 pm
Raul Castro (kremlin)

Raul Castro, in his one minute announcement on Cuban television disclosing the death of his brother, referred to Fidel Castro as the “Founder of the Cuban Revolution.” The label of “Founder” reveals the regime’s unshaken belief in its continuity.

Fidel Castro, while a background presence, had been effectively out of power for a decade. In that time, Raul has orchestrated a seamless succession with himself as First Secretary of the Communist Party, and the next generation of communist leadership made of men of his choosing.

This is the bittersweet reality for freedom loving Cubans, who had often believed in the slogan “No Castro no problem.” Fidel Castro may be gone, but structurally the regime remains intact. Fidel Castro’s death does not come with freedom for the Cuban people.

His legacy is one of thousands of firing squad executions, brutal repression, concentration camps and every possible violation of human rights. He transformed, what in 1958 was one of the most prosperous countries in Latin America into an impoverished dysfunctional state from which 20 percent of the population has fled.

According to the “Freedom in the World” report by Freedom House, Cuba remains the only country in the Americas deemed “Not Free” with scores in the worst-of-the-worst categories for political rights and civil liberties. Yet, the Castro brothers, as the architects of this tragedy, are not disgraced but honored by the sycophancy of many world leaders.

Cuba is now a nation with a discredited ideology, a dwindling elderly leadership, and a bankrupt economy. So what is next for that tragic island? Let’s begin by examining what I call a culture of acquiescence.

A “meme” is the neologism coined by British scientist Richard Dawkins to explain the way in which ideas and behaviors are transmitted in society by non-genetic means in contrast with transmission by genes. For instance, a child constantly exposed to violence at home may come to accept violence as natural. In political science, I think of memes as sociocultural genes that help explain how, in totalitarian societies, the presumption of power deposes the presumption of liberty.

Usually, the exercise of power alone is not sufficient to preserve an oppressive regime. At some level, there has to be a tacit acceptance that the ruling class possesses some legitimacy to the right to rule. In China, Vietnam, North Korea and Cuba, the revolutionary mysticism attached to Mao Zedong, Ho Chi Minh, Kim Il-Sung and Fidel Castro served to confer that legitimacy. Over time, the presumption of liberty is replaced with the acceptance of tyrannical powers as lawful.

In China, Vietnam, North Korea and Cuba, coercive power has engendered memes of acquiescence fostering the generalized presumption that the rulers are born with the right to command and the people are born with the obligation to obey. This too is part of Fidel Castro’s legacy.

When thinking of post-Fidel Cuba, it is essential to keep in mind that Cuba’s history for the past 60 years is that of the Castro brothers and their ideas. Raul Castro’s inner circle is not made up of closet democrats waiting for an opportune moment to put into practice their long-suppressed Jeffersonian ideals. Their governing modality is ontologically inseparable from their ideology.

If we posit that change in Cuba will not come about as a result of some U.S. or international intervention (outside-in change), nor will it come about as a result of some bottom-up event such as an Arab Spring, then we are left with top-down change. That is, change that originates with a leadership that lacks a democratic culture and has a built-in negative incentive towards democratic reforms.

Of course, the imponderable, the possibility of an improbable black swan event is always present. One such black swan occurrence may be an unknown Václav Havel or Boris Yeltsin in the midst of the Cuban military that is able to emerge and consolidate power as a true reformer. But at this juncture it is hard to visualize a likely path to a liberal democracy, or how Cuba’s future may break out of its Gordian knot.

José Azel José Azel

Senior scholar at the Institute for Cuban and Cuban-American Studies at the University of Miami. Azel was a political exile from Cuba at the age of 13 in 1961 and is the author of Mañana in Cuba. Follow @JoseAzel.

Venezuela Begins 2017 With Lowest Foreign Reserves in 21 Years

By: Karina Martín - Jan 4, 2017, 10:32 am
The Maduro regime has burned through substantial foreign currency reserves in the past year (

Español The Central Bank of Venezuela (BCV) experienced a 32.78% fall in the country's foreign reserves at the close of 2016. As of Monday, January 2, international reserves stood at USD $11 billion; a considerable decline considering that on the same date last year (2016), the country had USD $16.3 billion in foreign reserves. Read More: Maduro Regime Forced to Buy Its Own Bonds as Markets Shun Venezuela Read More: Venezuela: State Raw Materials Monopoly Threatens Journalism Venezuela has not had such a precarious level of foreign reserves in 21 years, when this indicator stood at USD $10.6 billion in 1995. "Basically, the government is burning though its international reserves to pay to service its debt," said economist Jesus Casique. Currently the country's foreign debt is at USD $150 billion. "I do not know where they are going to scrape together the financing. If you liquidate debt but simultaneously take on even more debt, you are mortgaging Venezuelans," said Casique, noting that by 2015 USD $ 2.4 billion from the International Monetary Fund (IMF) had been withdrawn via Special Drawing Rights (SDRs). googletag.cmd.push(function() { googletag.display('div-gpt-ad-1459522593195-0'); }); The Venezuelan regime has repeatedly alleged that the reason for the economic crisis that the country is suffering is due to the sustained fall of the oil prices from 2014, in addition to a supposed "economic war" that, according to Chavismo, is orchestrated by external enemies based in the United States, Spain, and Colombia, among others, in order to generate "destabilization". During 2016 BCV did not publish any data on inflation, gross domestic product (GDP) or the country's scarcity indicators. The data that has been obtained, have been forecasts by international organizations which have indicated that the Venezuelan GDP will shrink by 10% and that inflation will exceed 500%. Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro has agreed with members of the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC) and other nations outside the cartel that will cut output in order to boost oil prices. Sources: El Universal, El Nacional, La Patilla

Weekly E-Newsletter

Get the latest from PanAm Post direct to your inbox!

We will never share your email with anyone.