EspañolMembers of The Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia (FARC) traveled to Havana to meet with The National Liberation Army to discuss strategies for reaching peace with the Colombian government.
“The government delegation reports that, through the Office of the High Commissioner for Peace, a meeting was authorized between members of the ELN Central Command and the Secretariat of the Revolutionary Armed Forces in the city of Havana,” a public announcement said.
Leader of the guerrilla group Rodrigo Londoño Echeverri, also known as “Timochenko” tweeted a picture of the meeting:
— Rodrigo Londoño (@TimoFARC) May 8, 2017
Tweet: I am with the FARC’s Secretariat in Havana, Cuba, to reach a consensus for peace with the ELN.
The International Committee of the Red Cross was in charge of the FARC guerrilla’s transportation to the Cuban capital from the city of Valledupar.
“From Valledupar leaving for Havana in search of formulas and consensuses to unlock the key to a peace process for Colombia,” Luciano Marin Arango, also known as “Ivan Marquez” said in a video. “Its implementation is fundamental to consolidating peace and reconciliation.”
- Read More: Uribe’s Party Seeks Alliance with Conservatives for 2018 Election
- Read More: FARC Guerrilla Throws Full Support Behind Venezuela’s Dictatorship
The purpose of the meeting between the guerrilla groups was to exchange ideas about the Santos-FARC peace agreement made last year, which some hope can serve as a model for what ELN will propose as well.
The FARC-Santos agreement has come under fire for allowing transitional justice, as well as not addressing factions of the group that don’t want to lay down their arms.
On February 7, in the city of Quito, Ecuador, officials from the Colombian government and ELN opened a process of dialogue aimed at ending the confrontation that has lasted more than 52 years.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JXks1-MbWhk&feature=youtu.be The US House of Representatives recently passed a bill to repeal and replace ObamaCare, known as the American Health Care Act (AHCA), by narrow margins. The 217 to 213 vote followed intense lobbying on the part of Speaker Paul Ryan and vice president Mike Pence. The bill includes major changes on pre-existing conditions, overturning the individual mandate, shifts some of the financial burden from the young to the elderly, converts Medicaid funding to a block-grant system for the states, and slashes Medicaid funding and some subsidies. Read More: Why Trumpcare is Far Worse than Obamacare Read More: Time to Kill ObamaCare for More Choice, More Competition Children would still be allowed to remain on their parents' plans until the age of 26, and states will be allowed to add a work requirement to Medicaid. The bill was opposed by two distinct coalitions of Republicans. On one side, a group of libertarian-minded representatives who felt the bill did not go far enough, and was a mere regurgitation of the failed ideas that were the basis of ObamaCare. Thomas Massie (R-KY), for example, claimed the legislation is “replacing mandates, subsidies and penalties with mandates, subsidies and penalties.” On the other hand a number of moderate Republicans were concerned by funding cuts in Medicaid. Prominent Florida representative Ileana Ros-Lehtinen released the strongest statement in opposition, suggesting, "the proposed changes to this bill would leave too many of my constituents with pre-existing conditions paying more for health insurance coverage and too many of them will even be left without any coverage at all." A last minute change under the auspices of the so-called Patient and State Stability Fund was key to win over the support of moderate holdouts. The fund provides $100 billion to help states manage the costs of providing care to their most expensive patients. As PJ O'Rourke once noted, "If you think healthcare is expensive now, wait until you see what it costs when it's free." During ObamaCare's tenure, costs have skyrocketed, while private insurance industry profits have doubled, as noted by both Ted Cruz and Bernie Sanders in a CNN-sponsored healthcare debate. The real key to driving down costs is to get the government out of healthcare entirely. The 80% to 90% of Americans who are capable of paying for their own health insurance should do so, while private charity is a far more efficient and effective institution to provide healthcare to those who truly are incapable of taking care of themselves.