Trending

Newsletter

Five Free-Market Lessons from Don Quijote

By: Guest Contributor - May 2, 2017, 4:03 pm
Five Free-Market Lessons from Don Quijote
The greatest irony involving commerce in Don Quijote is that the marketplace rescues the novel from its own violence. (Main Lesson)

By Eric Clifford Graf

Economists from the Austrian School have long argued that the free-market mindset, which reached its pinnacle during the classical liberal period of the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries, traces its own origins back to the early modern period, especially the ideas of the neo-scholastic thinkers of sixteenth and seventeenth-century Spain known as the School of Salamanca.

Just to name a few, men like Domingo de Soto (1494-1560), Martín de Azpilcueta (1491-1586), Diego de Covarrubias (1512-77), Luis Saravia de la Calle (1500s), Tomás de Mercado (1525-75), Luis de Molina (1535-1600), Juan de Mariana (1536-1624), and Felipe de la Cruz Vasconcillos (1500s) were keen to define, analyze, debate, and explain things like interest rates, the pricing of goods and services, the causes and effects of inflation, the advisability of different monetary policies, and the relation between supply and demand.

Miguel de Cervantes (1547-1616), author of the first modern novel, Don Quijote de la Mancha (part one, 1605; part two, 1615), was familiar with the School of Salamanca. As evidence, here are five major ideas at the core of free-market thinking which are also at the core of Don Quijote.

(1) Subjective value: Salamancan and Austrian economists embrace the notion that free and voluntary exchange implies that even two wrongs can make a right. If both of us leave happy, the “true” value of things we exchange matters less than the fact that we exchange them. Tastes, wants, and needs are subjective. Indeed, such differences are precisely why we produce stuff and trade it. Without them we would all be poor, starving brutes. Examples of subjective value theory abound in Cervantes. In DQ 1.21, the hidalgo asks Sancho: “do you not see that knight coming toward us, mounted on a dappled gray and wearing on his head a helmet of gold?” The squire is unconvinced: “What I see and can make out… is just a man riding on a donkey that’s gray like mine, and wearing something shiny on his head.”

(2) Time value of money: In the Protestant world, men like John Calvin and Henry VIII began eroding usury laws around 1550. In Spain, the Salamancans debated. Saravia’s Instrución de mercaderes (1544) marked a transition between different ways of thinking about business; Mercado’s Suma de tratos y contratos (1569) advanced a liberal view of charging interest; Vasconcillos’s Tratado único de intereses (1637) indicated the basic injustice of borrowing money for free. Cervantes’s critique of usury laws appears in DQ 1.4’s dialogue between the hero and Juan Haldudo regarding the back pay the peasant owes the shepherd Andrés. Don Quijote calculates that “nine months, at seven reales a month” come to “seventy-three reales.” It’s a game of perspectives. If we laugh at Don Quijote, we endorse the official policy against interest; if we accept his calculation, we think like rational market participants. By the way, a surcharge of ten reales for the use of sixty-three reales for nine months, or 21% annually, was a reasonable rate around 1600.

(3) Free labor markets: Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels credited Thomas Hobbes as an originator of their materialist assessment of how the world works. They liked Hobbes’s critique of metaphysical thinking but also his understanding of labor as a commodity subject to the law of supply and demand. A fundamental aspect of the transition from feudalism to bourgeois capitalism involved an awareness that we should compensate people for their property or services. Throughout Don Quijote, squire and hidalgo negotiate Sancho’s salary. In DQ 1.20, Sancho presses his master: “I would like to know… just how much a squire made from a knight-errant in those days, and if they were paid on a monthly basis or daily, like bricklayers.” When Sancho threatens to go on strike in DQ 2.7, Sansón Carrasco, also known as “perpetual diversion and delight of the courtyards of the schools of Salamanca,” offers his services and Don Quijote perceives a market: “Did I not tell you, Sancho, that I would have plenty of squires from whom to choose?” Hobbes was a serious reader of Don Quijote.

Destrucción del valor adquisitivo de los cuartos de vellón en el siglo XVII

(4) Stable currency: John Maynard Keynes observed that only one man in a million perceives the destructive effects of inflation. Hoping likewise, the Habsburg kings of early seventeenth-century Spain undertook the first modern industrialized production of fiat money to finance their wars, corruption, and extravagance. The results correlate well with the fall of the Spanish Empire marked by the Treaty of Westphalia in 1648 (see figure). Artificially induced inflation was criticized by members of the School of Salamanca, especially Mariana. Philip III burned Mariana’s books and the Inquisition charged him with lèse-majesté. In DQ 1.1, the first metaphor in history’s greatest work of fiction involves a comparison between Rocinante’s hooves and the decayed purchasing power of the era’s quarter coins. In DQ 1.17, Cervantes has his hero attack what is first described as the king’s money cart. It’s really a cart carrying the King’s lions, which refuse to fight. But when Don Quijote tips the driver and the lion tamer with gold coins, it’s symbolic: gold is a store of value against Philip III’s money. The narrator reports that the lion tamer “promised to relate that valiant deed to the King himself when he arrived at court.” Don Quijote remains defiant: “If, by chance, His Majesty should ask who performed this deed, tell him it was the Knight of the Lions.”

(5) Sweet commerce: Montesquieu’s notion of “doux-commerce,” a vision of the positive effects of trade, anticipated Adam Smith, James Madison, David Ricardo, Norbert Elias, Steven Pinker, and Niall Ferguson. Anticipating Montesquieu was Mariana: “There’s nothing more excellent in human life than that good faith by which commercial relations are established and society among men is constituted.” Don Quijote also concerns this lesson. The protagonist’s madness dissipates as he comes to terms with bourgeois virtues. In DQ 1.1, he is mismanaging his domestic economy such that not even Aristotle could help him. In DQ 1.2, he learns that, unlike chivalric novels, the real world requires payment for goods and services. Fittingly, the innkeeper knights him by pretending to read Latin from an accounting ledger. By DQ 1.7, our hero grasps that he must finance his adventures: “hawking one thing and pawning another, all for less than he should have, he came up with a reasonable amount.” Don Quijote is perhaps most bourgeois in DQ 1.44, where he quietly resolves, without his usual recourse to violence, a payment dispute between the innkeeper and two guests.

The greatest irony involving commerce in Don Quijote is that the marketplace rescues the novel from its own violence. In DQ 1.9, the narrator explains how he acquired the continuation of the text that ended in the middle of the knight’s battle with the Basque in DQ 1.8. Asymmetrical information about bundles of paper the narrator spies in El Alcaná, Toledo’s marketplace, results in their purchase and then the employment of a local Morisco to translate them. Think about this. We couldn’t read the novel past DQ 1.8 were it not for the miracle of a multiethnic marketplace for goods and services. Montesquieu was a serious reader of the first modern novel.

Cervantes was a capitalist? An Austrian? A free-market Randian? A libertarian? An English liberal? We hedge by saying he was a precursor. Nevertheless, when it comes to thinking about economics, there’s a tangible intellectual feedback mechanism amplifying the influence of the first modern novel. Salamancan thoughts on political economy influenced Cervantes; later, proto and classical liberals, who also read Salamancans, often validated their ideas while reading Don Quijote. John Locke, Thomas Jefferson, and Frédéric Bastiat had reasons for being intense fans of the first modern novel. But that is another story.

Eric Clifford Graf (PhD, Virginia) is director, writer, and host of Universidad Francisco Marroquín’s Discover Don Quijote de la Mancha, a MOOC (“massive open online course”) available in both English and Spanish.