Canada’s $8 Million Settlement with Prominent Terrorist is an Outrage

By: David Unsworth - @LatinAmerUpdate - Jul 10, 2017, 3:05 pm
The Canadian government's settlement with terrorist Omar Khadr has been widely criticized (
The Canadian government’s settlement with terrorist Omar Khadr has been widely criticized (

On July 27, 2002, Omar Khadr, son of prominent al-Qaeda financier Ahmed Khadr, was captured in the eastern Afghanistan village of Ayub Kheyl, following an intense firefight in which he killed American medic Sergeant Christopher Speer with a grenade, and blinded U.S. Special Forces Sergeant Layne Morris. Extenuating circumstances would soon bring Omar Khadr’s case international news coverage.

Khadr was only 15 at the time of his capture, and furthermore, a Canadian citizen. The conservative government of Stephen Harper fully supported the United States in its vigorous criminal prosecution of Khadr, which resulted in his detention in Guantanamo Bay. Justin Trudeau‘s government, in a development that many have found utterly distasteful, has recently announced that the Canadian government will be awarding Khadr USD $8 million ($10.5 million Canadian dollars) for the violation of his rights.

The decision has come under fire, particularly from the soldiers who captured Khadr 15 years ago in rural Afghanistan. Layne Morris, in an interview with the Toronto Sun, argued, “I don’t see this as anything but treason…it’s something a traitor would do. As far as I am concerned, Prime Minister Trudeau should be charged.”

Trudeau has claimed, however, that the case is out of his hands, noting at the G-20 summit in Germany that, “the charter of rights and freedoms protects all Canadians, every one of us, even when it is uncomfortable. This is not about the detail of the merits of the Khadr case. When the government violates any Canadian’s charter rights, we all end up paying for it.”

Khadr’s case raises serious questions about the legal status of child soldiers and the use of so-called “enhanced interrogation” techniques utilized by the Bush administration during the War on Terror.

The libertarian movement has had a contentious relationship with the War on Terror. There is no doubt that Bush in the post-9/11 era used the threat of radical Islamic terrorism to drastically expand the size and scope of the federal government, creating such bureaucratic behemoths as the Department of Homeland Security, and ramping up funding for the CIA, NSA, and the military.

Unfortunately, Bush’s foolhardy foreign policy led us down the road of costly and impractical foreign military adventurism and nation building, rather than focusing on eradicating terrorist networks. It appears clear now that the War in Iraq, in particular, did nothing to diminish terrorism; in fact it did just the opposite…allowing radical jihadis in the country’s restive Sunni triangle to use the fragile young nation as a springboard for launching radical jihadi networks throughout the Middle East and North Africa.

Regardless of your perspective on American foreign policy in the post-9/11 era, what is clear is that Omar Khadr is no innocent victim in this matter. If the United States government does not have the will to aggressively prosecute a 15 year old terrorist who has American blood on his hands, it will only further incentivize the use of even younger children by terrorist networks in the future.

Canada’s Conservative leader Andrew Scheer was outraged by the payout, calling it “a slap in the face to men and women in uniform who face incredible danger every day to keep us safe.” However, according to Canada’s Liberal Party establishment, Khadr is entitled to the compensation due to the fact that the Canadian government violated Khadr’s civil rights by helping the US government to use harsh interrogation techniques to collect evidence to be used against him at his trial.

Khadr pleaded guilty to murder and war crimes, was sentenced to 8 years, repatriated to Canada in 2012, and then released from prison in 2015.

Despite the extenuating circumstances involved in the case, and complicated issues of criminal law, it should be substantially clear to all but the most indoctrinated left-wingers that Khadr’s payout of USD $8 million at the hands of Canadian taxpayers is a travesty. Three generations of the Khadr family have pursued terrorism and radical jihad, waging war against the West and our values.

This will go down in Canadian history as the most despicable instance of appropriation of government funds. Omar Khadr is a terrorist and a murderer and it is an outrage that Justin Trudeau’s government is hijacking the language of morality to justify this onerous settlement, just one more example of political correctness run amok.

Only in Canada can you join al-Qaeda, murder American soldiers with a grenade, and then get rewarded for your experience at the hands of the taxpayers. The battle against al-Qaeda and its radical jihadi allies is not a game of capture-the-flag. It is war. And it is time that we start treating it as such.

David Unsworth David Unsworth

David Unsworth is a Boston native. He received degrees in History and Political Science from Washington University in St. Louis, and subsequently spent five years working in real estate development in New York City. Currently he resides in Bogota, Colombia, where he is involved in the tourism industry. In his free time he enjoys singing in rock bands, travelling throughout Latin America, and studying Portuguese.

Tearing Down “Energy Wall” between U.S. and Mexico Would Boost Manufacturing, Argues George W. Bush Institute

By: Elena Toledo - @NenaToledo - Jul 10, 2017, 2:01 pm

EspañolThe George W. Bush Institute is looking to remove all barriers between the United States and Mexico that make it unnecessarily difficult to investigate in energy infrastructure. The institute is also working to help eliminate presidential approval as a requirement for making changes to infrastructure on the border. The initiatives first arose in November 2015, when the US State Department rejected TransCanada's request for presidential approval to start building the Keystone XL Pipeline. A Minnesota District Court ultimately ruled in favor of the State Department's decision, which further prevented the project from going forward. Read More: Mexico: Manuel Obrador Holds Slight Lead in 2018 Presidential Elections Read More: New Study Shows Just How Out of Control Violence in Mexico has Become Then, in January 2016, TransCanada made two separate attempts to undo Barack Obama's rejection of the pipeline project. The first involved contesting the need for executive approval for the pipeline. The second involved an attempt at correcting Title 11 of the North American Free Trade Agreement. The recent actions taken by President Donald Trump regarding energy policy are a "game changer" in the eyes of the George W. Bush Institute: "The expansion of the agreement to include energy cooperation not only generates new market opportunities for American goods and services, it also puts North America in a position to be an energy super power," the Institute said in a statement addressed to the State Department. googletag.cmd.push(function() { googletag.display('div-gpt-ad-1459522593195-0'); }); This institute suggested establishing security and environmentally conscious regulations, adding that officials should work toward opening up the market so investment in energy can flourish as an entity fundamental to manufacturing and security in North America. "Our governments have been cooperating closely on all levels of commerce and related topics for almost three decades," the Institute said. "As a result, many things are now better understood, and they need little more than strong political compromise in order to come to a conclusion." Source: El Economista

Weekly E-Newsletter

Get the latest from PanAm Post direct to your inbox!

We will never share your email with anyone.