Uruguayan Economy Minister Danilo Astori called the statements by Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro made about Uruguayan Foreign Minister Rodolfo Nin Novoa an “insult.”
It is something “very serious that we can not accept in any way,” said Astori.
- Read More: Maduro Scared to Face the Music in Uruguay
- Read More: Why There are no Easy Solutions for Venezuela as Maduro Drives the Country to the Brink of Disaster
Maduro affirmed that Nin Novoa “coordinates the agressions against Venezuela with the US Department of State, coordinates with the US ambassador in Montevideo the aggression against Venezuela.”
“The truth is that what Mr. Maduro said about the Uruguayan government headed by Dr. Vazquez, whom he says he respects, is a very serious insult that we can not accept in any way,” said the minister in total rejection of the statements made by Maduro.
“Besides being an insult, it is also an injustice, because Uruguay has acted with a lot of tolerance with Venezuela. If Venezuela is still in Mercosur, it is because Uruguay that has always tried to calmly moderate the situation, even when Venezuela has come under fire from its other Mercosur partners.
Astori also said that Venezuela can no longer be called democracy because the government is “profoundly authoritarian.”
“The facts are demonstrating every day the authoritarianism with which the president and the executive branch of Venezuela manage the country and handle the other branches of power: the legislative branch has practically had its power dissolved at Maduro’s whims.”
President Tabaré Vázquez also backed his chancellor, according to the Minister of Transport and Public Works, Victor Rossi.
Rossi also said that there has been no telephone conversation between Vazquez and Maduro, as claimed by the latter.
Venezuela’s increasingly authoritarian government finds itself isolated in the region. It has also seen former allies of Maduro’s regime, such as Brasil’s Dilma Rousseff and Argentina’s Cristina Kirchner, replaced by center-right governments.
Maduro has vowed to fight the OAS attempt to invoke the Democratic Charter, relying on key allies such as Bolivia and Nicaragua.
On March 31, the PanAm Post published an opinion article by David Unsworth titled "The Venezuelan Regime's Puppet Extraordinaire: Mark Weisbrot, America's Worst Economist." Unsworth's conclusion about Weisbrot, a long-time academic apologist for Chavista misrule in Venezuela, summarizes the article's main argument perfectly: As Venezuela descends further into a dictatorship of starvation with each passing day, Mark Weisbrot remains surprisingly silent on his support for the Venezuelan regime and their economic policies. No Mark. This is not the economy of Greece or Spain. It is far worse. The apocalypse that you assured us would never come, is here. How do you turn Latin America’s wealthiest economy into its poorest in just one generation? The answer: socialism. After receiving a complaint— and the threat of a lawsuit— from the Center for Economic and Policy Research, a left-wing think tank headed by Weisbrot which claimed that, in his piece, Unsworth suggested that Weisbrot's opinions were influenced by direct payments from the Venezuelan regime, the PanAm Post decided to remove the article from our website. We cannot prove with certainty whether or not Weisbrot has been directly financed by Hugo Chávez or Nicolás Maduro. However, we also cannot prove whether or not Weisbrot has received funding from agents acting on behalf of the Venezuelan regime or from institutions financed by Venezuela or its unsavory allies such as Cuba or Iran. As Unsworth wrote in his article, (Weisbrot's) close associate Deborah James, for example, is the former executive director of the innocuous-sounding Venezuela Information Office. In fact the VIO was a Chavez-funded propaganda operation intended to promote the wondrous achievements of Venezuela’s glorious socialist revolution, and lobby Congress on Venezuela’s behalf. Beyond the issue of whence Weisbrot procures his daily bread, which is not in the least in the PanAm Post's interests, the fact is that Unsworth's intention in writing about "America's worst economist" was to emphasize the disastrous nature of Weisbrot's "'predictions' about the wondrous future of Venezuelan Communism." Not only did Weisbrot claim that the Maduro regime would never face a balance-of-payment crisis, but he also discarded the possibility of hyperinflation in Venezuela and ruled out the collapse of the country's currency as well as the possibility of massive food shortages. Today, however, the Venezuelan regime faces serious difficulties paying its foreign debt while its citizens endure hyperinflation, a currency so devalued "it no longer fits in wallets", and massive shortages of food and medicine. In other words, if economists could be sued for malpractice, as Unsworth writes, "there is surely no economist in America more deserving of such treatment than Mark Weisbrot." Read More: Top 10 Clueless Celebrity Statements about Hugo Chávez's Revolution Read More: Venezuela: Food and Medicine Shortages Are a Deliberate Government Policy By removing Unsworth's article from the PanAm Post's website, we apologize to Weisbrot if any reader was led to believe that his disastrously mistaken economic predictions were due to venality and not to his mere professional incompetence. We now request his apology to the people of Venezuela for facilitating the Chavista obliteration of their country, petty as his role as a useful idiot may have been. We won't hold our breath in expectation, however; saying "sorry" for the damage they cause is hardly the 21st Century Socialists' bread and butter.